IT’S the only thing to make Tony Abbott’s gaffes bearable.
A clever YouTube user has remixed the Opposition Leader’s latest slip ups with “Bangarang”, a hit song from Dubstep musician, Skillrex.
User “NewsLabCentral” dubbed the video “Abbottrang” and wrote in the video caption: “While his renditions of Blue Danube and The Hustle were great successes, Tony is now targeting the youth of the nation as they enrol to vote.
“He jumped into the studio to play around with Dubstep, and we think the kids will love it!”
He also makes good use of Abbott’s umming and ahhing.
The coming budget will reveal the Prime Minister as a barefaced liar.
Tony Abbott; Cartoon by Andrew Dolphin
“I trust everyone listened to what Joe Hockey said last week and again this week,” he told an SBS interviewer on election eve last September. “No cuts to education, no cuts to health, no change to pensions, no change to the GST and no cuts to the ABC or SBS.”
Of that lot, it’s likely only the GST will be untouched. The ABC will be hit ruthlessly, with tens of millions of dollars slashed in what the government’s weasel spinners will try to sell as an “efficiency dividend”.
When I wrote here last November that “the fight for the ABC is on”, I knew the Tories would be vindictive. I had no idea they would get so viciously personal; led by Mr Murdoch’s myrmidons, of course. Just recently, News Corpse writers have likened the ABC managing director, Mark Scott, to Joseph Goebbels and Vladimir Putin. Individual journalists are frequently targeted by name. The Australian spent an entire week monstering the Media Watch presenter, Paul Barry, for some perceived offence to its editor-in-chief’s delicate sensibilities. The madder ideologues, like the mouths for hire at Melbourne’s lunar Right Institute of Public Affairs, shrill that the place should be sold off altogether.
Watch this space. The battle for the ABC is just warming up.
ALL POLITICAL careers end in failure, as the saying goes. Few come to a crashing halt in such spectacular fashion as the O’Farrell premiership. One moment there was Barry, master of all he surveyed, about to announce billions of dollars of airport with Tony Abbott. The next he was writhing in the Macquarie St gutter, mortally wounded by an alcohol-fuelled, one-punch assault. Oh, the irony.
In all fairness, he deserves a better exit. He was an assiduous if unspectacular premier, and a decent man. I have known him and liked him since he was a bog standard backbencher making the occasional radio appearance on my ABC702 Drive show years ago. “You taught me how to use the media,” he said to me once.
Not well enough, apparently. More than a month ago a News Corpse journalist fired off a text message to O’Farrell asking if he had indeed received this now infamous bottle of ’59 Grange after the 2011 election. That should have sounded the air raid sirens loud and clear, but evidently it did not.
Jobs for an Ex-Premier; Cartoon by Kudelka
Yet I cannot believe that he was dishonest. The ICAC Counsel Assisting, Geoffrey Watson, has made it plain that he doesn’t think so either. He was forgetful, calamitously so. But remember that the wine arrived on the O’Farrell family doorstep amidst all the sound and fury of forming government, and within days of the death of his father-in-law. Sure, he did make a phone call to thank the ever-generous Mr Di Girolamo, followed up by the polite note which king-hit him. But the forgetfulness is understandable, if not forgivable. But how does one forget a 1959 Penfolds Grange?
O’Farrell’s true fault was his failure to keep his promise to root out the endemic corruption of the NSW Liberals. He baulked at bold political reform. As we will see in the next ICAC trawl, the Liberal Party state machine is rotten with spivs and shonks, touts and urgers, spongers and leeches, bludgers and layabouts, shysters and shifters, corridor whisperers and sleeve-tuggers. It is infested by the buyers and sellers of power and influence. If it never plumbed the dark depths to which Edward Moses Obeid and his cronies dragged the ALP, it was still sloshing around in the same sewer.
Barry O’Farrell was plainly aware of this but unwilling – or more likely unable – to expel the moneychangers from his temple. In the end, they got him.
Has Prime Minister Abbott and his office been misleading the public about his decision to restore imperial honours, compromising – and also offending – the Queen. Senior correspondent Barry Everingham suggests they have.
Yesterday, Jonathan Swan and Peter Hartcher threw doubt over Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s dealings with the Queen over the knights and dames issue in a piece published in the Sydney Morning Herald.
At the same time they were investigating this topic, I was also independently looking into this same issue and can now provide more information.
In summary, it doesn’t look good for Abbott.
Swan and Hartcher summarised the background as follows:
Tony Abbott announced last week that Quentin Bryce had been made a dame and Peter Cosgrove a knight. But had they really?
The Prime Minister’s surprise statement began: “On my recommendation, Her Majesty the Queen has amended the Letters Patent constituting the Order of Australia.”
Letters Patent are the official instrument, the parchment signed by the Queen’s own hand with her distinctive “Elizabeth R”, that give force to her decisions.
But, mysteriously, although they are public documents published in the Government Gazette, no one has been able to provide evidence that one was signed.
Or show that the Queen had signed the parchment at the time of the Prime Minister’s declaration.
This raises an awkward question. When Mr Abbott publicly pronounced Ms Bryce a dame in time for her official reception on March 25, was she? General Cosgrove started using the title Sir on March 28 after his swearing-in as Governor-General, but again was he officially allowed to claim that title?
The PM seemed to imply by his statement he had conferred directly with the Queen, however when Abbott called the Palace, my sources say he did not speak to the Queen but rather to one of her senior aides.
Abbott allegedly advised the aide that he was “restoring” a “truncated” (his words) part of the Order of Australia.
And, despite Abbott’s announcement, the subject of the Letters Patent was apparently not mentioned at that time but arose later, when the legality of his unilateral decision had time to sink in.
When I contacted the PM’s press office – the most arrogant, secretive and insulting PM’s office I have ever had the misfortune to deal with in my several decades as a journalist – they refused to comment and, indeed, slammed their phone down in my ear.
Hartcher and Swan did manage to speak the PM’s office:
After repeated requests over several days, neither the Prime Minister’s office nor Buckingham Palace would give Fairfax Media the exact date on which the monarch signed the official instrument.
On Wednesday afternoon – after Fairfax Media published this story online – a spokeswoman for the Prime Minister said “the documents” had been signed by the Queen on March 19.
But the Prime Minister’s office continued to refuse to release the signed parchment, saying the Letters Patent, which are public documents, would be published “in due course”.
Government House was unable to shed any light on the mystery. An official said Government House had not seen the Letters Patent or any copy of them.
My enquiries strongly suggest Tony Abbott bypassed the usual channels when he announced he had decided to reinstate imperial titles in the Order of Australia.
The normal accepted practise in such matters is that a joint announcement would come from the PM’s office and the Palace and they would issue a simultaneous release.
This would be followed up by a confirming announcement in the Government Gazette, which it did, but in this case no one seems to know if the Queen signed the necessary papers — and, if she did, when did she sign and where is the original?
When I called Government House, they refused to comment. In my experience, this means they were left totally out of the loop.
I then called the Palace to ask about Abbott’s decision. I received a similar response — though the anger in the royal aide’s voice was palpable.
I asked the Palace whether the titles conferred by Abbott were legal at the time he made his announcement.
I was coldly told that Abbott doesn’t confer titles, the Queen does, so I should ask Mr Abbott whether everything was legal.
Swan and Hartcher’s enquiries suggest it was not legal:
The spokeswoman had earlier said that an “electronic version” had been sent and signed in mid-March and that the signing of the paper version was “under way”.
However, there is no electronic version of Letters Patent, according to people familiar with Palace workings, and only the parchment bearing the monarch’s signature has any force.
An email exchange, in other words, may be no substitute, nor carry any official weight.
According to my sources, when the Prime Minister Tony Abbott grandly announced he was restoring knights and dames on 25 March, nothing was set in stone. In short, he lied about the Letters Patent.
And there is no such thing as an “electronic” Letters Patent — like the honours themselves, the “Letters” are a relic of another day and age.
Abbott has second guessed the Queen, which would be, in the eyes of the Palace, simply unforgiveable.
His office is now spinning desperately to try to get him out of trouble, but this merely illustrates what a mess this impetuous prime minister creates by going it alone — as he so often does.
The damage he has wrought is significant.
Firstly, his arrogance in bypassing Government House in Canberra, which he obviously did, will cause unnecessary frostiness there.
As for his Liberal Party colleagues, some 40 per cent of whom are republicans, most are privately furious he did not consult them about this move.
Despite being an avowed – one may say, obsessed – monarchist, Abbott has caused major ripples in the Queen’s office. It is a brave – indeed insane – prime minister of any country who would try to second guess Queen Elizabeth II; when it does happen, the offending politician is usually soon put back in their box.
And as to whether former Governor-General Quentin Bryce is really now a dame and Peter Cosgrove a knight?
Based on this list of gaffes since August 2010, it appears that Tony Abbott is no more fit to be Prime Minister or to represent Australia on the world stage. Between August 2010 and August 2013, Abbott has managed to insult, offend or annoy to varying degrees Africans, Irish, Indonesians, Chinese, Finns, Papua New Guineans and Luxembourgers. Abbott was elected as PM on 7 September 2013.
Abbott’s creepiness is evident in a pre-election video to Big Brother housemates in which he appeared with two of his daughters, asking for votes because his ‘daughters are hot’.
Questions have been asked about expenses Abbott claims for days he swims, runs, cycles and volunteers.
Taxpayers paid $336 in taxi fares for him to attend church on Good Friday.
And $23,560 to charter a plane for two days in 2012 to visit Bendigo and Horsham.
In 2009 Abbott used $9,400 of taxpayers’ money to promote his book which he repaid in 2010 after being caught out. Compare with Peter Slipper, who has faced court over alleged misuse of Cabcharge vouchers worth $964.
It’s the launch of Abbott’s paid parental leave policy in the lead up to the 2010 election. Mums and toddlers are present. While commenting on the to-ing and fro-ing between him and then PM Gillard about the number of televised debates, Abbott uses wording associated with campaigns against rape to criticise Julia Gillard. “Are you suggesting to me that when it comes from Julia, ‘No’ doesn’t mean ‘No’.” Abbott repeated this phrase a number of times. He later rejected suggestions that some women might find his comments offensive.
Abbott offended thousands of people with disabilities by suggesting that discussions in parliament about accessibility were a waste of time.
Abbott makes himself the butt of jokes after saying he would personally take the decision for asylum seeker boats to be turned around. “ Mr Abbott said the phone call from sea would come to him – on the boat phone – and it would be his choice whether or not to turn a boat back if it was safe to do so.
Abbott misread Andrew Wilkie during the post-election negotiations about which party the independents would support to form government. Wilkie rejected a billion dollar offer from Abbott to build a hospital, labelling it as over the top and irresponsible.
Abbott turned down an offer by then PM Gillard to visit troops in Afghanistan with her on his way to UK. He said that he wanted to arrive fresh in the UK for meetings with the UK Conservative government which drew criticism from many, including the mother of a soldier who died in Afghanistan. She said of Abbott “It’s all about him”.
Abbott went to Afghanistan later in October. Despite him asking the ADF not to do so, photos of him firing machine guns were released. Neil Mitchell labelled him a dill, adding: “He looks like a schoolboy playing with guns… This is not a game. This is war and Australians have died. Guns are dangerous and our soldiers carry them to protect themselves. Tony Abbott didn’t need a gun.”
At a press conference, Tony Abbott refers to the National Broadband Network (NBN) as “essentially a video entertainment system.”
At the time of the QLD flood crisis, Abbott rejected then PM Gillard’s proposal for a flood levy, a decision seen by some Liberals as ”ham-fisted and half-cocked”. To make it worse, on the day that cyclone Yasi bore down on North QLD, Abbott emailed Liberal party members to ask them for campaign contributions to fight the ALP’s proposed flood levy.
Mark Riley interview with the bizarre sight of Abbott speechless and with his head nodding for an extended period of time after being asked about his ‘shit happens’ remark in Afghanistan.
Abbott, having called for a ‘people’s revolt’, was reluctant to address assembled crowds displaying signs saying “Ditch the Witch” and the like, for fear of being judged by keeping such company. But he did address them and has been judged accordingly. Abbott claimed he didn’t see the worst of the signs but he was standing alongside them in some pics
While in Whyalla, Abbott claims it will be wiped off the map by the introduction of carbon tax; and that it risks becoming a ghost town and an economic wasteland.
Reports of tensions in the Liberal party, caused by Abbott making announcements that embarrassed and undermined Joe Hockey in the lead up to the budget and ending up with a slanging match between them
NZ Prime Minister Key visited Australia and Abbott breaks convention by inserting domestic politics into his welcoming speech; he congratulated Key for ”dramatically watering down” the emissions trading scheme the NZ government inherited.
Ireland’s ambassador to Australia and leading members of the Irish community complained after Abbott told a not very funny Irish joke during a speech. Prof Ronan McDonald, Chair in Modern Irish Studies at the University of New South Wales said “The ‘stupid Irish’ joke might get a laugh in a Bradford comedy club circa 1973, but seems astoundingly ill- judged coming from an aspiring world leader in 2011”. Abbott apologised to the ambassador.
Abbott wins the Sans Science comment of the month award for his ignorant comments (he said much the same thing on different occasions) in relation to how CO2 emissions are calculated: “It’s actually pretty hard to do this because carbon dioxide is invisible and it’s weightless and you can’t smell it.”
President Obama visits Canberra. Abbott makes a speech in parliament and cannot resist taking a swipe at the government rather than remain apolitical as per convention on such occasions. “Some Liberal MPs were… unhappy.’ We were squirming in our seats,’ one said.”
Abbot t jokes on radio ‘ Well, that was one boat that did get stopped, wasn’t it” about the Costa Concordia. Somewhat insensitive, as 11 people were dead and 21 people missing. He later apologises but qualifies it by saying ALP should recognise banter.
Abbott apologises for saying in question time that then PM Gillard has a target on her forehead.
Abbott claims in a press release that in 100 days “the world’s biggest carbon tax will commence .” According to a January 2013 OECD report: “The highest overall effective tax rates tend to be in European countries… The lowest effective tax rates on carbon are found in Australia, New Zealand and the Americas (Chile, Canada, Mexico and the United States).” Abbott’s claim is perhaps more accurately characterised as a lie, rather than a gaffe.
Abbott is criticised for comments made following the death of Margaret Whitlam, aged 92 years old. ‘He said she was a ”woman of style and substance” and ”a marvelous consort to a very significant Labor leader and an epochal Australian prime minister…There was a lot wrong with the Whitlam government but nevertheless, it was a very significant episode in our history…”. His comments were perceived as ‘inappropriately scoring a political point, of being vindictive, and an affront to basic decency’.
When in WA, Abbott agrees with WA premier that WA gets too little of the GST pie. In response to outcry that ensues from elsewhere in the country, in particular Tasmania, he has to backtrack.
Tony Abbott distinguishes himself by running out of parliament to avoid his vote being counted, after Craig Thomson – he of the so-called ‘tainted vote’ – indicated he would be voting with the Coalition.
Abbott says effect of carbon pricing will be a python squeeze rather than a cobra strike on the economy. This was of course utter nonsense as has become obvious over time, adding to the perception that what he says can’t be believed.
Abbott makes a speech in China which is widely criticised. A Herald Sun article by Steve Price is headlined ‘Abbott’s visit like a bull in a china shop’. It takes weeks of ‘clarification’ to calm it down.
Leigh Sales interview during which Abbott denied reading statement from BHP chief executive Marius Kloppers despite commenting on BHP, and falsely claiming that carbon tax was the reason BHP was reducing investments.
Lisa Wilkinson interview where Abbott says then PM Gillard still has questions to answer on the AWU/Slater & Gordon issue from about 1995. He can’t articulate any questions , didn’t watch the marathon presser where Julia Gillard took questions for almost an hour and didn’t read its transcript.
Then PM Gillard was in New York attending UN meetings. On 2GB radio Abbott says “our Prime Minister should not be swanning around in New York talking to Africans, she should be in Jakarta, right now, trying to sort out the border protection disaster”. He named Indonesian President Yudhoyono as one of the people she should be talking with. Both the Indonesian President and his Foreign Minister were attending the same UN meeting in New York as Julia Gillard. Abbott’s comments were offensive to African nations as well as plain stupid.
Abbott says what he offers the Australian people is “a return to economic growth” ignoring the fact that Australia has had 21 consecutive years of economic growth.
Australia wins a seat on UN’s Security Council. Before the ballot Tony Abbott says “If Australia can’t come first or second in a three-horse race involving Finland and Luxembourg, there’s something wrong with us…Let’s face it, it shouldn’t be too hard to win a race against Finland and Luxembourg.” Hardly appropriate words for someone seeking to represent Australia in international forums with world leaders
In question time during a speech about Peter Slipper, Abbott says that the ALP government should be dying of shame, echoing Alan Jones’ widely condemned comment of the previous month that then PM Gillard’s father died of shame. Maybe not said purposely but if not, where is Abbott’s presence of mind, acuity, that he used the phrase at all?
Abbott demonstrates his inability to understand a WA electricity bill, claiming carbon price led to more than doubling of cost of electricity. It was obvious from a bar chart on the bill that the person’s power usage had doubled.
Visiting a family home in Indonesia, Abbott puts his foot, complete with shoe, on the table near a bowl of food. So rude it’s hard to know where to start:
BODY LANGUAGE AND BEHAVIOR -Many western modes of behavior and body language are taboo in Indonesia. Be very aware of how you act in the presence of Indonesians in all situations. Some general rules to follow:
Never show the sole of your foot or point your toe at someone.
Keep both feet on the floor when sitting, don’t cross your legs
Lisa Wilkinson interview where she challenges Abbott on his strident claims that he can bring power prices down. Soon becomes clear that he’s repeating slogans about getting rid of carbon tax which would have minimal effect, and has no idea how to bring down power prices in any significant way.
Abbott is understood to imply ‘authentic’ Aboriginal people are those who live in the bush rather than elsewhere: “I think it would be terrific if, as well as having an urban Aboriginal in our parliament, we had an Aboriginal person from central Australia, an authentic representative of the ancient cultures of central Australia in the parliament”. A reporter who was there said that he has been misrepresented which then begs the question – why did Abbott not express himself more clearly.
Abbott endorses, defends, and backs Mal Brough while admitting he has not read Justice Rares’ scathing findings about Brough.
At an Australia Day Awards and Citizenship Ceremony in Adelaide, reading from a prepared speech, Abbott completely disregards and disrespects Indigenous people, by saying “The first lot of Australians were chosen by the finest judges in England, not always for good reasons…”.
Abbott was at a press conference at Salvation Army premises in Brisbane, praising the good work of organisations like the Salvation Army. In response to media questions he took the opportunity to put the boot in to asylum seekers, vilifying them, even though they are one of the groups the Salvos assist. Being apolitical and unlikely to comment, one can only assume that the Salvos did not appreciate being associated with such sentiments
Abbott talks about Coalition policy and GETS IT WRONG! (Sorry for shouting.) At 55 seconds, he says “I couldn’t put a strict time frame on abolishing the health insurance rebate”. The policy is to restore it. The official transcript of the presser was doctored so there is no record of his mistake. Does he know his own policies?
Abbott claims the GFC finished 4 years ago, as US and Europe struggle to recover, and Cyprus experiences a banking crisis.
Hamish McDonald interview, Channel Ten late news. Abbott says he does not do deals, seemingly forgetting the 17 days of negotiation with independents following the 2010 election.
Tony Abbott was heckled at Forced Adoption apology for using terms some find offensive, such as ‘birth mothers’ and ‘relinquish’. If he had read first few pages of Senate Report he would have known that. Interviewed by Sabra Lane the next day he didn’t acknowledge he was at fault in any way. His words: “…it was quite an emotional group in Parliament House yesterday”.
As he did almost a year ago, Abbott tells WA one thing about its allocation of GST and tells Tasmania another. Maybe this time he’s overreached as there’s an article in the Daily Telegraph calling him out on lying. “But that doesn’t mean that he should get away with telling porkies on the campaign trail” and “he tells people what they want to hear”.
When asked about proposed changes to superannuation, Abbott said “it shows that this is a Government which is prepared to tax the people to fund its own spending”. Maybe Abbott has not understood to this point that governments collect taxes to fund their spending. Why else would there be taxes?
At the joint press conference with Malcolm Turnbull announcing Coalition broadband policy, Abbott said “… at 25 megs, you can simultaneously be downloading four HD TV programs. So you can have four people in four different parts of the standard house watching the sport, a movie, whatever you might be doing. So we are absolutely confident that 25 megs is going to be enough, more than enough, for the average household.” His comments were met with ridicule as exampled by these tweets on same day. @z3n_: Abbott said you can download 4 HD movies on the Coalitions broadband policy at same time…Moron never said it would take 200+ hrs @zackster: Just told my colleagues in the office about @TonyAbbottMHR and 4 HDTV movies over 25mps… everyone burst out laughing.
Abbott’s statements about returning asylum seeker boats to Indonesia have drawn strong criticism from Indonesian authorities, again indicating that Abbott is not equipped to deal with international affairs.‘ Mahfudz Siddiq, the head of Indonesia’s parliamentary commission for foreign affairs, said Mr. Abbott’s comments demonstrated that the opposition leader “doesn’t understand the problem…This kind of opinion disrespects the talks we have already had which have been very productive. With wrong perception, even Indonesia could pull out from these cooperative agreements regarding people smuggling,” Mahfudz told AAP.’
An asylum seeker boat carrying 66 Tamils arrived at Geraldton, WA. Two weeks later Abbott was in Perth with local MP Michael Keenan. He unveiled a billboard asking the question ‘How many illegal boats have arrived since Labor took over?’ Below was the answer – 639 illegal boats.
This sparked widespread condemnation. The billboard was vandalised – 639 was changed to zero and a sentence added that it was no crime to seek asylum. It also inspired numerous spoof billboards eg ‘How many times do you need to tell racists there is nothing illegal about seeking asylum?’ ‘How many lies has Abbott told in the last year?’ and tweets such as ‘If Abbott can’t control billboards, how can he control borders.’ The billboard was taken down within 24 hours.
Alan Jones of 2GB is supporting farmers by campaigning against coal seam gas. On his program, Abbott indicated that if he was PM he would intervene to help farmers. This brought a complaint from the industry that Abbott was supporting Jones rather than energy development. Opposition resources spokesman Ian McFarlane clarified that this was a state issue. Two years ago, Abbott made similar comments defending farmers against energy developers which (a) ignored federal/state split of responsibilities and (b) required later ‘clarification’.
Abbott says in relation to his paid parental leave policy “We do not educate women to higher degree level to deny them a career…If we want women of that calibre to have families, and we should, well we have to give them a fair dinkum chance to do so. That is what this scheme of paid parental leave is all about.” Abbott’s comments, described by some as patronising and insensitive, raise questions yet again about his views on women, especially those who may not be well-paid and/or well-educated. His poor choice of words meant that the ensuing debate focused on Abbott’s attitudes rather than the merits or otherwise of the policy.
Abbott, while announcing the Coalition’s industrial relations policy , said that he understood and respected unionists. He also said “I ask the people of Australia, the workers of Australia, the unionists of Australia to look at my record as a Minister in this area.” Why did Abbott draw attention to what he did ten years ago? Within 24 hours a 2010 article written by then-Assistant Secretary of the ACTU was linked to via social media. The article summarised decisions taken by Abbott between 2001 and 2003 when he was Minister for Workplace Relations which were distinctly anti-worker and anti-union.
A gaffe or not a gaffe? On the eve of budget day Abbott, accompanied by Joe Hockey and Jamie Briggs, addressed the media to draw attention to what he described as a significant book – The Little Book of Big Labor Waste. I felt embarrassed for him as he held up what looked like a children’s book with BIG writ large on the cover. Was this the best Abbott could do on the day before the government brought down a budget for a trillion dollar economy?
Despite what seemed to be a well-attended Canberra press conference at which the book was spruiked, there has been little media coverage of it and it appears that Abbott and co are no longer waving the book around.
Abbott wrote a letter to the government confirming Coalition support for reforms to taxpayer funding of political campaigns. As the bills were about to be introduced into parliament, his backbenchers objected and Abbott withdrew his support. Abbott first claimed that he had never committed to the reforms and had not seen the legislation. ALP then released a letter dated the previous week in which Abbott wrote that he was satisfied with the agreement reached between the two major parties. Only a few senior Liberals were aware of the agreement. Then, when “news of the ‘secretly’ negotiated agreement was announced at the beginning of the week, Abbott’s office has misled and obfuscated”. Abbott’s initial response was to lie until caught out. “The fact that the alternative prime minister openly pretended to be uninvolved, and then simply reneged on a signed agreement, raises genuine questions of trust and reliability.”
Abbott addresses a small forum in Nowra in support of the local Liberal candidate and takes questions from the floor. When asked a question about local roads and rail, he responds “Well, in the case of the Federal Government we are going to have this organisation, Infrastructure Australia, which will do its best to rationally and as scientifically as you can look at various infrastructure projects and rank the best on public cost benefit – then all levels of governments will be able to fund what they choose to be the one that makes most sense”. He fails to say that Infrastructure Australia was introduced in 2008 by the ALP government and already does exactly that. This may not be a gaffe but a Coalition tactic. In a letter to voters a local candidate claims that under a Coalition government, age pensions will increase. He was in fact referring to twice yearly increases which would occur whichever government is in power.
Abbott at a doorstop interview: “I have applauded the Prime Minister’s overseas trips. For instance, I thought it was good that she went to New York for five days to try to lobby for Australia’s bid to become a temporary member of the Security Council. ” An outright lie – see gaffes made in September 2012. Why did he bother to lie, it was unnecessary? And it was noticed. During June 2013’s Question Time, as it became obvious then PM Gillard was about to bring up Abbott’s September 2012 gaffe, Warren Truss jumped up with an excuse for a point of order, to no avail.
Abbott says that Malcolm Turnbull “virtually invented the Internet in this country.” Maybe it was intended to be a joke but was not interpreted that way, perhaps
because it echoes what Abbott said in April 2013 at the launch of #Fraudband; that Turnbull was “one of Australia’s internet pioneers, as one of the founders of OzeMail”.
At a doorstop, Abbott told a persistent female journalist to ‘calm down’. Bridie Jabour was asking Abbott about expenses of $9,400 he had to pay back as they related to the promotion of his book. The incident set off the hashtag #calmdownbridie and more debate about his attitude to women.
At a presser, Abbot described an emissions trading scheme as a “so-called market in the non-delivery of an invisible substance to no one” for which he was derided. It was also taken to be a clever dog whistle to climate change denialists. His comment was remarkably similar to a phrase used by Mark Schapiro in 2010: “the carbon market is based on the lack of delivery of an invisible substance to no one”.
Following K Rudd’s announcement of an agreement with Papua New Guinea about asylum seekers, Abbott said that the Rudd government seemed to have “subcontracted out to PNG the management of our aid program at least in that country…Now it seems we are basically just handing over cash to the PNG government. Australian aid should never be a free gift to a foreign government.” The High Commissioner of Papua New Guinea based in Canberra issued a statement in which it “warned Australian politicians to observe international protocols and courtesies when discussing relations with other friendly sovereign nations and not impugn the dignity of our leaders who are attempting to assist Australia in this very complex regional and international issue of Asylum Seekers”. This was taken to be a response to Abbott’s comments which implied PNG leaders would spend aid money without any accountability or prudence.
August 2013 was a busy month for gaffes, so only the main ones. This, from The Australian, left me speechless. ‘In promoting Indigenous affairs to one of his top priorities, Mr. Abbott said there was no longer institutional racism in Australia and he believed most Australians saw Aborigines and Aboriginal culture as an “adornment” to the nation.’ Abbott attended the Garma Festival where he announced his new Indigenous advisory body. According to Louise Taylor (Aboriginal woman and barrister/lawyer) ‘Tony Abbott’s plan for Indigenous Australians is fatally flawed’. His speech was described (by Elly Michelle Clough) as a ‘foul potpourri of racism, paternalism and sexism’ which ‘has been completely ignored by the mainstream media, with the notable exception on Louise Taylor in The Guardian’. Abbott said “Here in the Territory, we’ve had a lost generation … kids didn’t go to school, adults didn’t go to work. The ordinary law of the land didn’t apply. Women cowering in their houses, or in their huts, in fear of what some drunken relative might do.” About this statement, it ‘is redolent with paternal colonialism. It demeans Indigenous women and it demonises Indigenous men.’
“No one,” Tony Abbott told a Melbourne gathering of Liberal Party faithful, “however smart, however well-educated, however experienced … is the suppository of all wisdom”. Ok, so everyone gets a word wrong now and again. This quickly went global, with Abbott the butt of numerous jokes, many listed under #suppository But it turns out it wasn’t even original. First said by US politician Bill Schuette from Michigan.
The following day on the campaign trail, Abbott was asked by a reporter what Liberal candidate, Fiona Scott, had in common with former Liberal MP Jackie Kelly. With his daughter next to him, Abbott replied: “They’re young, feisty and, I think I can probably say have a bit of sex appeal and they’re just very connected with the local area.” No mention was made of Scott’s achievements or competencies. She is a university-educated small business owner. Abbott’s ‘sex appeal’ comment was widely condemned and seen as one more in a pattern of sexist comments over many years, although he and colleagues sought to shrug it off as a ‘daggy dad moment’. Like ‘suppository’, it went global.
One more day, one more gaffe. When asked on radio about the issue of gay marriage, Abbott reiterated his view that marriage is between a man and a woman and spoke of the importance of tradition in the debate. “My idea is to build on the strength of our society and I support, by and large, evolutionary change,” he said. “I’m not someone who wants to see radical change based on the fashion of the moment.” Later in the day Abbott said that he was “not suggesting” gay marriage was a passing fad. If not, then (a) why did he not express himself more clearly and (b) what did he mean, if not that the widespread support of same sex marriage was the ‘fashion of the moment’?
Abbott announces a new policy while in full election campaign mode to a group of journalists – that of buying boats from Indonesian fishermen to stop the people smuggling trade. It is met with so much ridicule that after the day of the announcement, Abbott doesn’t mention it and he gets few questions about it. Reminiscent of the pre-budget and equally embarrassing “The Little Book of Big Labor Waste” (see above) which was announced with great fanfare, but little follow up. However it did not go unnoticed in Indonesia where it was described as insulting to Indonesians and shows ‘poor knowledge about the situation in Indonesia’.
Abbott announced that he would ‘offer retrospective compensation to Australian victims of terrorism abroad, similar to that of compensation to domestic crime victims.’ In response to a question from a journalist, Abbott said “If you are walking down the street at 2am in Kings Cross in Sydney and you get king hit, maybe you shouldn’t be there”. Abbott’s comments were described as offensive and irresponsible by the father of Thomas Kelly, an 18-year-old who was killed after being king hit in Kings Cross in 2012.
Abbott causes controversy while posing for a photo with school girls in netball gear. He encouraged them to “make body contact” while adding that a bit of body contact never hurt anyone and that he wished he was younger. This was three days after Abbott visited a factory that fits out fire engines amongst other vehicles and said to a female apprentice, “you’d be the most popular girl in the place I suppose wouldn’t you?” perceived again as an inappropriate and cringe worthy comment to a young woman that’s out of place in this day and age.
Finally, Abbott appears on Insiders. It is a few days before Australia is to take its turn as chair of the UN Security Council and at a time when there is the prospect of the US launching a military strike on Syria. Asked about that conflict, Abbott responded “It is not goodies versus baddies, it is baddies versus baddies”. Abbott’s comments go global with more questions raised as to whether he is capable of operating on the world stage without causing embarrassment to Australia.
The Prime Minister is at it again, refusing to answer questions that he doesn’t like. And in typical fashion he went on the offensive when responding to a perhaps inappropriate question from a member of the media.
Readers will know my opinion of the media and their attempts to influence government policy, but in this case the question was inappropriate for the occasion, but the response by the Prime Minister was equally inappropriate.
The hostile response, and the demeaning manner in which he addressed the member of the media, was inappropriate for a Prime Minister. Perhaps it would have more appropriate to ignore the question, or reject it as being inappropriate, and move on. No. Not Tony Abbott. He embarks on a tirade of opinion on his perception of a “decline in standards” by the media. Perhaps the question was inappropriate, but Tony Abbott should have identified it as such, and treated the question accordingly. His reaction was unbecoming a holder of high political office.
If the Prime Minister would like to see an improvement in standards, he has to look no further than his own repeated gaffes in public and parliament. To stem the “decline in standards”, Tony Abbott needs to address the way he interacts with the Australian media and public. Behaviour such as this by a Prime Minister is inappropriate, unprofessional and questions his suitability for high office. The behaviour of politicians both on state and federal level is partly responsible for the “decline in standards!”
The Coalition’s partial repeal of the QANTAS Sale Act has passed the Australian parliament’s lower house, as the Senate launched a public inquiry into the airline’s finances. MPs voted 83-53 to support the government’s bill, with independent Victorian MP Cathy McGowan siding with the Coalition. At the same time, the Senate with a Labour/Greens majority will vote down the bill, launched an inquiry into QANTAS’ finances and what measures could be used to support the company, including renationalising it or guaranteeing its debts.
The debate came after Joe Hockey denied pressuring QANTAS to reverse an earlier position on the carbon tax during a phone call with chief executive Alan Joyce yesterday. Greens senator Lee Rhiannon said she wanted Mr Joyce called to give evidence to the new inquiry and for Qantas’s books to be opened up to examination. “Clearly something has gone wrong with QANTAS — it is vital that we use the Senate inquiry to understand what has happened,” Senator Rhiannon said.
In the House of Representatives, Bill Shorten labelled the Coalition a bunch of “cheese-eating surrender monkeys”, a derogatory term for the French. “It’s taken 94 years to build QANTAS; it’s taken the Abbott government 94 minutes to tear QANTAS down. “Shame,” the Opposition Leader said after the vote.
The government’s bill would open the door for a structural separation of QANTAS’ domestic and international arms, repealing the 49 per cent cap on foreign investment in QANTAS and removing the barrier to foreign airlines buying more than 35 per cent of the company. Deputy Prime Minister Warren Truss told parliament QANTAS’ foreign ownership limits were “regulatory handcuffs” that must be removed if QANTAS is to remain in Australia and “grow”.
“Good government is not about playing favourites or being a banker for major companies when times are tough,” Mr Truss said. In my opinion, good business is not having to come to government expecting bail-outs or debt guarantees. Good business is making a profit while working under the regulatory framework in place at any time.
Mr Shorten said even if the bill passed the Senate, it would take years for QANTAS to overcome new regulatory processes that would allow it to raise sufficient foreign capital. In real terms, the bill has little to no chance of passing the senate.
Tasmanian MP Andrew Wilkie voted with the Labor Party, while Clive Palmer and Greens deputy leader Adam Bandt were not present for the vote. Again on an issue as important as this, key parliamentarians are absent from the house.
Later, in question time, the government attacked Labor for suggesting Qantas’s world-famous safety record could be compromised if maintenance jobs were sent offshore. Mr Abbott described the suggestion as “irresponsible’’ and “reckless’’. “The leader of the opposition is trying to suggest that without the restrictions that exist under the Qantas Sale Act an airline can’t be safe,’’ he said.
Independent Bob Katter also questioned the impact on safety of overseas maintenance. “Surely, this must be one whose maintenance is based in Australia, not one whose market advantage comes from a cut-rate cheap jack overseas-based workforce?,’’ he asked Industry Minister Ian Macfarlane. The minister said QANTAS wasn’t the only airline to have a safe flying record. There are other airlines flying in Australia dont necessarily have their maintenance carried out in Australia. Does that make those airlines less safe?.
The Treasurer earlier revealed he yesterday spoke with Mr Joyce about the company’s apparent change of mind on the impact of the carbon tax on the airline’s profitability. QANTAS yesterday released a statement saying the carbon tax was “among the significant challenges” faced by the airline, apparently contradicting its earlier position that its “current issues are not related to carbon pricing”. Then Mr Joyce dramatically reversed his rhetoric on the company’s wellbeing, saying the airline was “extremely healthy”, just four months after warning of its possible demise. QANTAS yesterday said it had not been able to recover the carbon cost by increasing fares because of intense competition, while revealing it had cost $59 million in the past six months on top of $106m last financial year. “It is absolutely one of the factors that’s impacting the airline,” Mr Joyce said.
QANTAS is more than just an airline. It is an Australian airline, an Australian icon, with firm place in the Australian psyche. The “Flying Kangaroo” is a logo of special significance to all Australians. It has been stated that boarding a QANTAS aircraft is like “getting home before being at home”. Mr Joyce being Irish, has failed to realise this. He sees QANTAS in terms of aircraft, infrastructure and staff. As I said before on this web site, Australian business does not support CEOs who lose money and whose comapnies do not turn a profit. They sack them, usually with outrageous severance packages. I believe the axe is about to fall on Mr Joyce, probably sooner than later.
Is this legislation likely to be passed into law? I suspect not. Will QANTAS be allowed to to become more efficient? I believe it must, if it is going to remain a competitive world airline. A compromise position must be found.
In 2013 QANTAS for the first time has secured a place (8th) in the top ten world airlines in terms of service, value for money etc. All efforts must be used to make the airline competitive.
Over the years I have been a follower of the the ALP (Australian Labor Party) and their politics. Imagine my joy when Gough Whitlam and the ALP was elected to Federal Pariament in 1972, after more than 40 years of Liberal-Country Party Coalition rule.
But they never quite got it right! Subsequent Labor governments also failed to recognise the errors of their predecessors, and to correct them. This culminated in the Rudd-Gillard debacle, where leadership challenges (or talk of them) took centre stage, and all other policy whitered on the vine. “Enough”, I said. I can no longer follow this shambolic rabble that squander every opportunity given to govern.
As I could never follow the Liberal-National Party, as their policies are totally abhorent to my way of thinking, I have have moved my allegiance toward the Australian Greens. This has occurred mostly because of their position on flora/fauna, mining, the environment, fishing limits and their social policies.
But don’t get me wrong. I have a low opinion of ALL politicians, of any persuasion or colour, whose only and most pressing duty, other than to seek as many paliamentary lurks and perks (legal or otherwise), is to seek re-election every three years.
So when I came across this video on YouTube where WA Greens Senator Ludlum was sticking it to Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott, I knew I had to give it some air.
Also, you might note the empty Senate Chamber. No wonder government in Australia is of such a poor standard. There’s nobody at the helm!
That is Senator Ludlum on his feet in the bottom right of the picture, addressing only 3 other members of a 76 seat Senate!
“I will not be lectured about sexism and misogyny by this man, I will not.
And the Government will not be lectured about sexism and misogyny by this man. Not now, not ever.
The Leader of the Opposition says that people who hold sexist views and who are misogynists are not appropriate for high office.
Well, I hope the Leader of the Opposition has got a piece of paper and he is writing out his resignation”.
Julia Gillard
Gillard had, up until now, refrained from making any comment in reply to comments made by Alan Jones and Tony Abbott. Today she let loose in parliament, giving the Leader of the Opposition a 15 minute fiery dressing down on sexists comments made by him in the past.
George Brown is a decorated soldier and health professional and 40 year veteran in the field of emergency nursing and paramedical practice, both military and civilian areas. He has senior management positions in the delivery of paramedical services. Opinions expressed in these columns are solely those of the author and should not be construed as being those of any organization to which he may be connected.
He was born in the UK of Scottish ancestry from Aberdeen and a member of the Clan MacDougall. He is a member of the Macedonian community in Newcastle, and speaks fluent Macedonian. While this may seem a contradiction, it is his wife who is Macedonian, and as a result he embraced the Macedonian language and the Orthodox faith.
His interests include aviation and digital photography, and he always enjoys the opportunity to combine the two. Navigate to his Flickr site to see recent additions to his photo library.
Џорџ Браун е украсени војник и професионално здравствено лице и 40 годишен ветеран во областа на за итни случаи старечки и парамедицински пракса, двете воени и цивилни области. Тој има високи менаџерски позиции во испораката на парамедицински услуги. Мислењата изразени во овие колумни се исклучиво на авторот и не треба да се толкува како оние на било која организација тој може да биде поврзан.
Тој е роден во Велика Британија на шкотскиот потекло од Абердин и член на Kланот MacDougall. Тој е член на македонската заедница во Њукасл, и зборува течно македонски. Иако ова можеби изгледа контрадикција, тоа е неговата сопруга кој е македонски, и како резултат научил македонскиот јазик и ја примија православната вера.
Неговите интереси вклучуваат авијација и дигитална фотографија, и тој секогаш ужива во можност да се комбинираат двете. Отиди до неговиот Фликр сајт да видите последните дополнувања на неговата слика библиотека.
Discussion on the law that applies to or affects Australia's emergency services and emergency management, by Michael Eburn, PhD, Australian Lawyer. Email: meburn@australianemergencylaw.com
Oh, let's see...distinguished Gen-X'er, frustrated writer and mom living in the confines of a small town that thinks it's a big deal. And have I mentioned Walmart yet?