US President Donald Trump has gone back on his plans to create a cyber-security alliance with Russia, after the proposal was met with severe condemnation by several Republican senators.
Mr Trump raised eyebrows when he initially said on Twitter that he and Russian President Vladimir Putin had discussed “forming an impenetrable Cyber Security unit” to tackle issues like election hacking and “many other negative things”.
Perhaps his suggestion didn’t get the traction he had hoped for, because only hours later, President Trump said it would not happen.
Mr Trump’s initial claim came after he met with the Russian leader at the G20 Summit in Hamburg.
Many high-profile Republican Senators were dumbfounded by the idea, questioning why the United States would want to work with Russia given Moscow’s alleged meddling in last year’s US election.
“It’s not the dumbest idea I have ever heard, but it’s pretty close,”Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina told NBC’s Meet the Press.
Senator Marco Rubio also ridiculed the proposal, tweeting: “Partnering with Putin on a ‘Cyber Security Unit’ is akin to partnering with Assad on a Chemical Weapons Unit.”
“While reality & pragmatism requires that we engage Vladimir Putin, he will never be a trusted ally or a reliable constructive partner.”
“We have no quarrel with Russia or the Russian people. Problem is with Putin & his oppression, war crimes & interference in our elections.”
And while outspoken Senator John McCain acknowledged Mr Trump’s desire to move forward with Russia, he said “there has to be a price to pay” for the nation’s involvement in the 2016 presidential election.
The Trump backflip comes a day after he was the subject of a scathing review from Australian journalist Chris Uhlmann, that quickly went viral, and in the same weekend the president’s son was accused of meeting with a Kremlin-linked lawyer during the 2016 election campaign.
According to The New York Times, Donald Trump Jr was promised damaging information about Hillary Clinton before agreeing to meet Russian lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya.
It is unclear whether Ms Veselnitskaya produced the promised information about Ms Clinton, but it was likely she would have done so, according to the NYT’s sources.
Trump’s ridicule continues
President Trump has also been criticised for the release of a bizarre video, which recaps his experience of the G20 summit.
Mr Trump tweeted a two-minute video on Sunday titled, “Make America Great Again”, which featured pictures of himself attending the G20 Summit set to a ‘Make America Great Again’ soundtrack.
Mr Trump raised eyebrows when he initially said on Twitter that he and Russian President Vladimir Putin had discussed “forming an impenetrable Cyber Security unit” to tackle issues like election hacking and “many other negative things”.
Perhaps his suggestion didn’t get the traction he had hoped for, because only hours later, President Trump said it would not happen.
Mr Trump’s initial claim came after he met with the Russian leader at the G20 Summit in Hamburg.
Many high-profile Republican Senators were dumbfounded by the idea, questioning why the United States would want to work with Russia given Moscow’s alleged meddling in last year’s US election.
“It’s not the dumbest idea I have ever heard, but it’s pretty close,” Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina told NBC’s Meet the Press.
Senator Marco Rubio also ridiculed the proposal, tweeting: “Partnering with Putin on a ‘Cyber Security Unit’ is akin to partnering with Assad on a “Chemical Weapons Unit.”
“While reality & pragmatism requires that we engage Vladimir Putin, he will never be a trusted ally or a reliable constructive partner.
“We have no quarrel with Russia or the Russian people. Problem is with Putin & his oppression, war crimes & interference in our elections.”
And while outspoken Senator John McCain acknowledged Mr Trump’s desire to move forward with Russia, he said “there has to be a price to pay” for the nation’s involvement in the 2016 presidential election.
The Trump backflip comes a day after he was the subject of a scathing review from Australian journalist Chris Uhlmann, that quickly went viral, and in the same weekend the president’s son was accused of meeting with a Kremlin-linked lawyer during the 2016 election campaign.
According to The New York Times, Donald Trump Jr was promised damaging information about Hillary Clinton before agreeing to meet Russian lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya.
It is unclear whether Ms Veselnitskaya produced the promised information about Ms Clinton, but it was likely she would have done so, according to the NYT’s sources.
Trump’s ridicule continues
President Trump has also been criticised for the release of a bizarre video, which recaps his experience of the G20 summit.
Mr Trump tweeted a two-minute video on Sunday titled, “Make America Great Again”, which featured pictures of himself attending the G20 Summit set to a ‘Make America Great Again’ soundtrack.
Phone records and intercepted calls show that members of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and other Trump associates repeatedly contacted with senior Russian intelligence officials in the year before the election, the New York Times reports.
US law enforcement and intelligence agencies intercepted the communications around the same time they were discovering evidence that Russia was trying to disrupt the presidential election by hacking into the Democratic National Committee, three of the officials said, according to the Times.
The intelligence agencies then sought to learn whether the Trump campaign was colluding with the Russians on the hacking or other efforts to influence the election, the newspaper said.
“Surely, these are grounds to call Trump’s election as president into question?
The officials interviewed in recent weeks said they had seen no evidence of such cooperation so far, it said.
However, the intercepts alarmed US intelligence and law enforcement agencies, in part because of the amount of contact that was occurring while Mr Trump was speaking glowingly about Russian President Vladimir Putin.
The intercepted calls are different from the wiretapped conversations last year between Michael Flynn, Mr Trump’s former national security adviser, and Sergei Kislyak, the Russian ambassador to the United States, the Times said.
Michael Flynn had earlier assured Vice-President Mike Pence that he had not discussed sanctions with the Russian envoy.
During those calls, the two men discussed sanctions that the Obama administration imposed on Russia in December.
Mr Flynn misled the White House about those calls and was asked to resignon Monday night.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request from Reuters for comment on the Times story.
On the Russian side, the contacts also included members of the Russian government outside of the intelligence services, the officials reportedly said.
All of the current and former officials spoke on the condition of anonymity because the continuing investigation is classified.
The officials said that one of the advisers picked up on the calls was Paul Manafort, who was Mr Trump’s campaign chairman for several months in 2016 and had worked as a political consultant in Russia and the Ukraine.
The officials declined to identify the other Trump associates on the calls.
Unsanctioned, unofficial contact with another country may be construed as treasonous?
The call logs and intercepted communications are part of a larger trove of information that the FBI is sifting through as it investigates the links between Mr Trump’s associates and the Russian government, as well as the DNC hack, according to federal law enforcement officials.
As part of its inquiry, the FBI has obtained banking and travel records and conducted interviews, the officials said.
Mr Manafort, who has not been charged with any crimes, dismissed the accounts of the US officials in a telephone interview on Tuesday.
“This is absurd,” he told the Times. “I have no idea what this is referring to. I have never knowingly spoken to Russian intelligence officers, and I have never been involved with anything to do with the Russian government or the Putin administration or any other issues under investigation today.”
“It’s not like these people wear badges that say, ‘I’m a Russian intelligence officer’,” he added.
President Vladimir Putin has said Russia must boost its combat readiness in response to NATO’s “aggressive actions” near its borders.
Addressing the Russian parliament Putin also criticised the West for its reluctance to build a collective security system with Russia.
‘‘NATO is strengthening its aggressive rhetoric and its aggressive actions near our borders. In these conditions, we are duty-bound to pay special attention to solving the task of strengthening the combat defences of our country,” he declared.
Last month, Moscow announced plans to create three new divisions to meet what it described as a dangerous military build-up on its borders.
NATO chief, Jens Stoltenberg urged dialogue.
“The important thing is that we need the NATO/Russia Council to have a chance of political dialogue open with Russia and especially when tensions are high. It is important that we talk, that we meet and that we do whatever we can to prevent misunderstandings, miscalculations, and try to reduce tensions,” Stoltenberg said.
NATO is also set to send four battalions to Poland and the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in an attempt to prevent a repeat of Russian actions, such as the annexation of Crimea in 2014.
Russia has openly stated that it wishes to regain those states or territories lost after the break-up of the former Soviet Union. The simple solution to this problem is for Russia not to covet those now independent states and to clearly and unequivocally denounce any intention to attempt to annex them.
Primarily, the Russian people have only been driving for a short time. Prior to the fall of communism in 1989, private ownership of motor vehicles was severely restricted by cost, but more importantly, to restrict the free movement of the population within the former Soviet Union. Access to motor vehicle ownership in the last 27 years has increased exponentially! What has not increased however is the skill, ability, psyche and consideration that goes with the operation of a motor vehicle. Accompanied by this, is a distinct lack of experience, discipline and courtesy needed when driving on a public road.
There also appears to be no concept of consequence in Russia. This results from a lack of lateral thinking which is not nurtured in Russian society as well as their education. So they drive like aggressively without regard for road rules believing they’re not causing any harm. Russians believe the bigger the car they drive, the safer they are. Hence why drivers of 4x4s tend to be even more aggressive then drivers of a Fiat Punto.
Russia: The only place where you can be rear-ended whilst overtaking, driving the wrong way up a one way street!
Corruption
Corruption is rife in Russian which means that money can buy anything, including a driver’s licence. Russian get drivers licences with no knowledge of road rules or even the ability to drive a car! As a result there is little reason to learn the highway code. Thus everyone has their own view as to what the laws of the road really are. Continuing with corruption, if you drive like a idiot and get stopped, you can generally bribe your way our of being punished. Thus there is basically no fear of punishment which reinforces the belief that Russian drivers can behave at the wheel as they wish with impunity. Police are generally nowhere to be seen. They might occasionally pull you over nearer the centre of a city by being flagged down but a police car pulling someone over? Never! There are no cameras, except around the city centre but even if you are sent a fine, there is no system in place to actually guarantee payment of that fine. Many Russians who have been sent a fine have never paid it. So again, you can act without fear of punishment,
“There are only two types of Russians – those who give bribes and those who take them.”
So all in all, this theme finds its way into the Russian psyche. The Russians are not stupid because, if you are stupid, you still know the difference between right and wrong. 80 years of communism has lead Russians to be disillusioned and somewhat primitive. There is a big difference.
Driving in Russia is hazardous: Last year, 200,000 traffic accidents killed 27.025 people in Russia in 2013. Addressing those high levels, President Dmitry Medvedev blamed the “undisciplined, criminally careless behaviour of our drivers,” along with poor road conditions. However, Medvedev made no mention of the totally dysfunctional Russian traffic police!
Russians consistently ignore red lights, overtake on the inside, overtake on the outside when unsafe or blind, speed and couple this with little or no technical expertise or driving ability, this is a recipe for disaster!
While accepting that drivers certainly play a role, Medvedev did not mention Russia’s traffic police, which, “is known throughout their land for brutality, corruption, extortion and making an income on bribes.”
According to information published by New Times(2009), one day’s corrupt income for a traffic policeman is $1000. Everyone regards the law enforcement agencies, chiefly the police, as extortioners in uniform and it is generally recognised that a policeman’s official salary is only part of his income. Medvedev’s police reform, carried out by the police establishment itself, has failed. The overwhelming majority of Russians have no more faith in the police than they did in the Soviet past.
Russia ranks 133rd among the world’s nations in corruption (where number one is the least corrupt), according to Transparency International. So going to the police with a legitimate complaint is far from sure to produce a good result.
In addition to authorities they deem untrustworthy, Russian drivers must contend with the possibility of being attacked by another driver. The below video compiles fights between drivers that feature crowbars, slapping, punching, and worse.
Then there are pedestrians who get themselves hit by cars on purpose, for a payoff. A video compilation (below) of failed scams offers a few examples.
Overall, in a country where traffic conditions are horrible, insurance scams and roadside fights are always a possibility, and the police are widely viewed as corrupt, video evidence of one’s innocence can be a very valuable thing.
There are are number of things which also contribute to this situation:
Harsh climate. It means foggy mornings in the summer, rainy autumns, snowy winters notorious of its blizzards and ice, springs with huge lots of wet dirt.
Poor road conditions. Yes, that is no secret, that the bigger part of roads in Russia are not good. Perestroika, the crisis of 90’s and other economic problems including theft and corruption inside the Road construction department resulted in poor roads conditions
Large distances. It is much more easy and convenient to build and service roads in a small country, neither in Russia where distances between settlements sometimes can be counted in hundreds of km. Living in Siberia, one can take a ride from one city to another and not see civilisation for hours with only taiga forest around. In Australia, large distances are also an issue, but Australians do not have the poor driver behaviour as exhibited in Russia!
The Russian government did not expect people to have so many cars. The number rose dramatically over the last 25 years. In the west, the culture of proper driving was formed over a longer period, while in Russia it just boomed. The problem is much worse for big cities of 1 million citizens or more. Here we see too many cars on tiny roads and a lack of parking spaces. It makes people nervous while driving.
The other factor is culture. Russian people today haven’t learned to respect each other. And they won’t until the economic situation improves.
Vehicles and Vodka
Russia has a long history of alcohol consumption. The average Russian drinks 20 litres of pure alcohol per annum, nearly twice as much as their nearest rival. This of course carries onto the streets of Russia.
According to data, the number of drunk drivers has been steadily increasing in the past few years. In the last eight months of 2012, the number of accidents caused by drunk drivers rose by 3.5%. In that time, there were 152 alcohol related accidents in Moscow, which caused 15 deaths. And Moscow is far from being the worst city in Russia: in the Krasnoyarsk region there were 433 drunk driving accidents over the same period.
Some worry that stricter laws will mean serious punishment even for drivers who don’t drink, since Russia’s laws don’t specify a blood alcohol level at which one is considered drunk. United Russia lawmakers think that establishing specific criteria for drunk drivers is essential to the success of a stricter law. A threshold is important because human blood will always contain some alcohol, which could be detected in blood tests. Russia had an alcohol limit until 2010, but then-President Medvedev thought drivers interpreted the law to mean they could drink up to that point, and changed the law to zero-tolerance.
On the other hand, people who knowingly drink and drive might not be deterred by the new law at all. The police say people who regularly drive under the influence and accumulate suspended licenses for years simply ignore the sanctions (such as the driver in the recent accident in Moscow, whose license had been suspended in 2010 for drunk driving).
In the past two years, more than 18,000 drivers have had their license suspended for drunk driving. Among those drivers, some had been punished for drunk driving 100 times or put in administrative arrest 16 times for driving without a license. The law has no effect on this type of person, so a completely different approach is needed with them. It has been suggested that if they can’t stop themselves from drinking and driving, they need to be under the strict control of the courts and medical staff.”
The Russian Dash-Cam
In Russia, everyone should (and does) have a camera on their dashboard. It’s better than keeping a lead pipe under your seat for protection (but you might still want that lead pipe).
The conditions of Russian roads are perilous, with an insane gridlock in the city and gigantic ditches, endless swamps and severe wintry emptiness of the back roads and highways. Then there are large, lawless areas you don’t just ride into, the police with a penchant for extortion and deeply frustrated drivers who want to smash your face.
Psychopaths are abundant on Russian roads. You best not cut anyone off or undertake some other type of maneuver that might inconvenience the 200-pound, six-foot-five brawling children you see on YouTube hopping out of their SUVs with their dukes up. They will go ballistic in a snap, drive in front of you, brake suddenly, block you off, jump out and run towards your vehicle. Next thing you start getting punches in your face because your didn’t roll up your windows, or getting pulled out of the car and beaten because you didn’t lock the doors. These fights happen all the time and you can’t really press charges. Point to your broken nose or smashed windows all you want. The Russian courts don’t like verbal claims. They do, however, like to send people to jail for battery and property destruction if there’s definite video proof. That is why there’s a new, growing crop of dash-cam videos featuring would-be face-beaters backing away to the shouts of “You’re on camera, fucker! I’m calling the cops!”
Dash-cam footage is the only real way to substantiate your claims in the court of law. Forget witnesses. Hit and runs are very common and insurance companies notoriously specialize in denying claims. Two-way insurance coverage is very expensive and almost completely unavailable for vehicles over ten years old–the drivers can only get basic liability. Get into a minor or major accident and expect the other party to lie to the police or better yet, flee after rear-ending you. Since your insurance won’t pay unless the offender is found and sued, you’ll see dash-cam videos of post hit and run pursuits for plate numbers.
And sometimes drivers back up or bump their pre-dented car into yours. It used to be a mob thing, with the accident-staging specialists working in groups. After the “accident,” the offending driver–often an elderly lady–is confronted by a crowd of “witnesses,” psychologically pressured and intimidated to pay up cash on the spot. Since the Age of the Dash-cam, hustle has withered from a flourishing enterprise to a dying trade, mainly thriving in the provinces where dash-cams are less prevalent.
And then, sometimes, someone will jump under your car at a crossing, laying on the asphalt, simulating a badly hurt pedestrian waiting for that cop conveniently parked nearby. This dramatic extortion scheme was common, until the Age of the Dash-cam. Oh, and there are such juicy, triumphant tales about of would-be extortion victims turning the scheme around and telling the cast members to pay them money or they’re going to jail for this little performance! Don’t try it.
While those lucky enough to traverse the Russian roads with an American or other Western passport are hassled less, the Russian Highway Patrol is notorious throughout their land for brutality, corruption, extortion and making an income on bribes.
Russian websites go for the uncut, the horrible accidents–trucks flipping over, people being smashed into pieces and sedans flying up in the air and exploding. Given that television programing is mostly vacuous and heavily censored, dash-cam videos are very popular in Russia. It’s uncensored–drama, comedy, tragedy, horror, thriller and educational genres fused into one super-genre of “dash-cam.” Who needs Klitschko when you can watch to tough guys box in the street?
To better understand and navigate this “community service”, here’s a Russian Dash-cam Video Thesaurus for the blog tag cloud. It is comprised of purposely misspelled hick and thug slang and phrases used sarcastically…while people die. Ah, Russian humour.
поциент – “Patient.” The poor bastard, the dumb idiot in the video getting pulverized, run over or smashed into. A wordplay of “potz,” the Russian translation of the Yiddish “schmuck.”
летчик – “Pilot.” The idiot who zooms by and crashes in the grand finale of a video.
слабоумие и отвага – “Courage and dementia.”
последние секунды жизни – “Last seconds of life.” Videos featuring persons before and after fatal accidents.
кетай как всегда пиздец – “China is always fucked.” Clips from China that feature severe crashes and frequently feature passersby ignoring the bodies and car debris.
кирпичи – “Bricks” (as in “shitting bricks.”) The audio track often features the driver panting or shouting the entire Russian vocabulary of swears at the top of their lungs. Used for videos with near misses or close shaves.
железобетонное очко – “Anus of Concrete.” Honorific given to drivers who, faced with sudden danger like a huge truck coming head-on, remain calm, only saying “shoot” or “darn” quietly in the background, and efficiently steer away from danger, displaying some seriously fucking great driving skills.
наварра – The infamous video featuring a black Nissan Navarra SUV swerving to the oncoming freight liner and being smashed into a cloud of small pieces. It is the metaphor for a gruesome, intense, fatal accident.
But there are moments of humanity among the Russian people,. At a city accident scene, you could see as many as twenty cars pulling over, drivers running out to the scene. This comes from the recognition of the fact that on a 300-mile stretch of uninhabited territory, help can only come from passing vehicles and not emergency services. Most Russian long-distance routes East of the Ural Mountains are that way. There is really only one highway like that in North America: the Western Canadian to Alaskan Stretch of the Pan-American Highway. The camaraderie between strangers, shoveling the snow and hailing a freight truck or tractor to pull the car out. The kudos. The cheers. The knowledge that you could be very well be next.
And don’t you forget it. Aside from the kindness of strangers, it’s just you and that little gadget versus the hell that is the Russian people on the road.
ONE year on from the disappearance Malaysia Airlines flight MH370, the world is still no closer to knowing for sure what happened to the ill-fated plane.
Despite the Australian Government committing $89.9 million to the search, a mission to scour the ocean floor west of Perth has failed to uncover any evidence pointing to the location of the passenger jet.
Now, a far-out theory from one of CNN’s chief commentators on the aviation disaster, science journalist Jeff Wise, has been circulated worldwide — and has more credibility than you might think, – or does it?
Wise’s theory is that the Russian government (indirectly) or FSB ordered the hijacking of the Boeing 777 and landed it in Kazakhstan.
Electronic signals or “pings” led investigators to believe that the plane flew south and crashed into the Indian Ocean, west of Perth. But Wise suggests that the pings detected off the coast of Australia had in fact been tampered with and that the plane instead flew north. He believes hijackers could have accessed the plane’s electronics and equipment bay (E/E bay) in the first-class cabin and messed with the burst frequency offset (BFO) data to throw investigators off the trail. “That would require an almost inconceivably sophisticated hijack operation, one so complicated and technically demanding that it would almost certainly require state-level backing,” Wise wrote in a New York magazine piece last week that has been circulated widely online.
Wise explained that a curious part of the plane’s footprint was that its satellite communications system disconnected and then came back online three minutes later, which he suggests was done on purpose by hijackers. “They turned on the satcom in order to provide a false trail of breadcrumbs leading away from the plane’s true route,” he wrote.
Wise believes the plane ended up in an airstrip in Kazakhstan, which Russia leased for its space program, but he offers no explanation about what happened to the plane after it landed.
He said that Russia had the satellite and aviation technology capabilities to pull off such a feat.
One reason Putin may have wanted to steal the plane would be to hurt the West and its allies, Wise wrote, particularly because the US had imposed punitive sanctions on Russia the day before MH370 disappeared.
“Maybe what he was really after were the secrets of one of the plane’s passengers. Maybe there was something strategically crucial in the hold. Or maybe he wanted the plane to show up unexpectedly somewhere some day, packed with explosives. There’s no way to know,” Wise wrote.
Sound like a crackpot conspiracy theory? Well, even Wise himself admits that he’s an MH370 “obsessive” and that his idea sounds crazy. He acknowledges in the New York magazine that his idea is “true conspiracy-theory material” and sounds like a “fantasist’s dream”. “That’s the thing about MH370 theory-making: It’s hard to come up with a plausible motive for an act that has no apparent beneficiaries,” he wrote. Wise told news.com.au that the positive reaction to his theory had been “mind-boggling”. “I spent a lot of time researching this topic, boring people to death, there were a lot of rolled eyes but now that the seabed has been searched, it makes sense we would be ready for this,” he said.
“There are two types of theories: The official scenario, which is pretty bare bones and doesn’t tell you why or who did it, and very elaborate conspiracy theories, but they don’t have any data,” Wise told news.com.au. “I think the appeal of my theory is it has data but it also has that satisfying thing of ‘Here’s who did it, here’s where it went and why’ and all that.
When solving any mystery – if you eliminate the impossible; what ever is left, however implausible, is possible.
While Wise, who is also a pilot, is considered an authority on the disaster, his notions have not necessarily found favour with other experts. He has written two articles on what he proposes could have happened to MH370
Read “The Spoof”here and “What Was Going On at Yubileyniy?”here.
Observations:
After reading these two articles, I believe there are a number of issues with this theory as I see it. While the circumstances included in the article “The Spoof” may be technically possible, the chance of getting away with it would be slim in the extreme.
However, I consider that there are other physical factors which make this scenario unlikely, and in the main it is around the suggestion that the B777 auto-landed in Yubileyniy Airport Cosmodrome (UAON) north of Baikonur in Kazakhstan.
Consider the following if you will:
The Boeing B777-200ER has a maximum take-off weight (MTOW) of 656,000 lbs./297,550 kg.
A B772’s maximum fuel load is 302,974lbs./135,660 kg. For it’s flight to Beijing, a distance of 2,500 miles, the fuel load is likely to be in the vicinity of 124,671 lbs./56,670 kg. with a duration of just over 7 hours.
The zero fuel weight (ZFW) of a B772 is 304,500lbs./138,100kg. I will get to why these weights are mentioned here shortly.
The flight to Kazakhstan would be just on or near the duration offered by it’s fuel load in Kuala Lumpur.
An instrument landing system (ILS) is a ground-based instrument approach system that provides precise lateral and vertical guidance to an aircraft approaching and landing on a runway, using a combination of radio signals and, in many cases, high-intensity lighting arrays to enable a safe landing during instrument meteorological conditions (IMC), such as low ceilings or reduced visibility due to fog, rain, or blowing snow.
Auto-land may be used for any suitably approved Instrument Landing System (ILS) or Microwave Landing System (MLS) approach, and is sometimes used to maintain currency of the aircraft and crew, as well as for its main purpose of assisting an aircraft landing in low visibility and/or bad weather. Yubileyniy is not so rated. Auto-land also needs to be supervised by pilots should anything go wrong.
Yubileyniy Airport has no ILS facilities, no runway side lighting, no runway centre line lighting and no approach lighting. The airport has not been used since the demise of the Russian space shuttle program in 1989.
Wise postulates that MH370 was hijacked and flown to Kazakhstan and landed at Yubileyniy at night, using the aircraft’s auto-land facility. Clearly, with no ground based ILS facilities, an ILS approach, and thus auto-land cannot be used.
Without runway lighting available, any approach at night is suicidal. But is that a consideration?
A visual approach, if possible, would need to be carried out by qualified pilots.
The surface of the runway at UAON is equally dilapidated, rough and uneven and even if a landing had been attempted, the ability to use the runway is questionable.
Supposing that the B772 did land, there is one final consideration. The location were Wise states that bulldozing had been carried out, and the aircraft possibly “hidden”, is 3km from the runway. This area is accessed by narrow roads of dubious quality and road surface, which would appear to be not wide enough or able to support a aircraft weighing in excess of 140,000 kg.
Burying a Boeing 777 would be an enormous undertaking and not something that can be done in a couple of days. Any hole in which to bury the aircraft would need to be 60ft./20m deep to hide the tail – unless it was removed!
Surely somebody located or serving at the nearby Gagarin Space Port would have seen something? How do you keep any number of people quiet? To keep a secret, the less people who know, the better!
This leads me to my last observation. If the aircraft was hijacked and flown to Yubileyniy; how was it auto-landed without ground based ILS equipment, without lighting, on a runway not used for over 25 years.
Then, on an area as open and barren as Yubileyniy, where was the aircraft “hidden”?
Lastly, who benefitted from this? And why? And what is the point of carrying off an incident like this if you can’t gloat or claim responsibility for it?
As I’ve stated before, the simplest causes and explanations are the most likely!
After the bloody suppression of a patriotic demonstration in Warsaw in 1861, Alexander Herzen wrote to Tsar Alexander II: “You have become a common murderer, an ordinary thug.” He also described the Russian press as “shameless” and “unscrupulous.”
Today, perhaps we should repeat the words of this great Russian, and direct them at Vladimir Putin and his Russian press-men who are lying ceaselessly and insolently. First we hear that Poland trained the Ukraine fascist squads that terrorized the Maidan; next we are told that Putinist conquerors of the Crimea bought their weapons and uniforms in stores and that the Kremlin had nothing to do with it. Now we are once again hearing about the Ukraine state’s responsibility in the MH-17 disaster.
The 298 victims of the shoot down of the Malaysia Air flight are a result of Putin’s ruthless and cynical imperialist policies. It was his decision to arm and finance the so-called “separatists” who in reality are the Kremlin’s spy network and fifth column in the Donbass region. They were armed with Putin’s knowledge, approval and money. And these people are the ones who killed random, innocent individuals.
Putin—with his KGB polkovnik mentality—does not want to let Ukraine follow its own path toward democracy and Europe. He wants to reconstruct the Russian empire. Inciting, upholding and supporting ethnic conflicts in Latvia and Estonia serves this aim, as does the creeping dismantling of Moldova, and maintenance of conflicts around Upper Karabakh. Indeed—this great power, this great Russian chauvinism is the final and highest stage of communism. And Putin understands progress as gradual and complete annexation of successive former Soviet states.
The European Union—accustomed to peace and quiet—has neither determination nor an understanding of the growing threat. The clichéd faith in the possibility of placating the beast is replaying over and over again. The blindness and loyalty of European political and business elites gives reason for concern. But there is nothing that releases us—intellectuals active in culture, scholarship, and media—from the duty to say clearly, stubbornly, and emphatically: This is very dangerous. We must not be allowed to repeat the naiveté once displayed by intellectual elites toward Hitler and Stalin. And back then we were not allowed to close our eyes to the annexation of Austria, Czechoslovakia, and the Baltic States.
My friend from Moscow says that there are two scenarios in which the Russian army will leave Ukraine: One realistic and the other miraculous. In the realistic scenario, Saint George will ride in on a dragon and use his fiery sword to chase this band of scoundrels away. That’s the realistic scenario. And the miraculous one? They’ll just up and leave on their own.
The policy of successive concessions leads nowhere. Putin is not a European-style politician; he’s a politician of permanent belligerence and aggrandisement. Much seems to suggest that he has already let the genie out of the bottle—crowds of mercenaries are moving from Russia to Ukraine, crowds of sentimental monarchists, Orthodox fascists, National-Bolsheviks, and the like. Arming these bandits with first-class weapons is simply criminal. It is a good thing that Poland’s current government has taken an honest and judicious stance—it’s not flexing its muscles but it’s also not succumbing to illusions or hypocrisy.
Source: Adam Michnik – a leader of the anti-Communist opposition in Poland in the 1970s and 1980s, is the editor-in-chief of Gazeta Wyborcza, where this piece originally appeared (as edited). Translated by Agnieszka Marczyk.
US intelligence officials say they have no clear evidence of direct Russian government involvement in the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, which they say was most likely hit by rebels by mistake. This is a narrow view at the least considering the source of the weaponry used in the attack.
They say that MH-17 was likely hit by an SA-11 SAM fired by Russian-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine and that Russia “created the conditions” for the attack by arming and financing the separatists.
It is believed that the most likely explanation for why the plane was shot down was that the rebels made a mistake and misidentified the aircraft as that belonging to the Ukraine air force. Separatists had previously shot down 12 Ukrainian military aircraft.
“The most plausible explanation … was that it was a mistake,” and that the missile was fired by “an ill-trained crew” using a system that requires some skill and training, an official said. Again this statement does not stand the test of scrutiny! Why was this “ill-trained crew” using a technical weapons platform, but even so they still managed to shoot down an unidentified civilian aircraft flying at 33,000 ft by assuming it was a Ukraine air force aircraft.
The officials had made their appraisal using social media postings and videos made public in recent days by the Ukrainian government, even though tnot all off this evidence has been authenticated.
Video of a missile launcher said to have been crossing the Russian border after the launch, and appearing to be missing a missile has yet to be verified as being exactly what it purported to be.
It is still not known who fired the missile at MH-17 or whether any Russian operatives were present at the missile launch. As if Russia (or the separatists) is going to freely divulge that information!
It is also not certain that the missile crew was trained in Russia, although a stepped-up campaign in recent weeks by Russia to arm and train the rebels suggests that Russia is clearly implicated in this disaster. This training has continued even after the downing of the commercial jetliner. The Russian military had been training the rebels at a large base in Rostov on various weapons, including air defence systems, they said.
The claim that the Ukrainian government had shot down the plan was not supported and was unrealistic, as Kiev had no such missile systems in that area, which is clearly under the control of the rebels.
This would mean Ukrainian government troops would have had to fight their way into the area towing the weapons systems, fire at the passenger plane and fight their way out again. “That is not a plausible scenario to me,” the official said.
President Barack Obama said the Malaysia Airlines plane “was shot down over territory controlled by Russian-backed separatists in Ukraine.’’ He also said Russia has both trained the separatists and “armed them with military equipment and weapons, including anti-aircraft weapons”.
But in Russia, at a news conference held yesterday, defence chiefs offered two alternative theories about what happened to MH-17, the first being that it was possibly shot down by a Ukrainian SU-25 fighter jet. Moscow stated its radar systems had detected the fighter tracking near the Boeing 777 at the time it crashed and noted the plane was armed with air-to-air R-60 missiles (how?) that could shoot down the aircraft.
The US dismissed the claim as “desperate” propaganda, pointing out that Ukraine air force fighters cannot operate at 33,000 feet where MH-17 was flying and that Ukraine has told Washington that none of its planes was in the air at the time.
Russia also suggested MH-17 might have been shot down by a Ukraine government surface-to-air BUK missile system rather than a Russian supplied system provided to rebels by Moscow. But again, how did Ukraine get the missile into the rebel held area?
Russia seems to be offering feeble and implausible excuses to attempt to deflect their role in this disaster!
While there are various questions that have already emerged from what was supposed to be Ukraine’s irrefutable proof confirming Russian rebel involvement in today’s MH-17 tragedy, perhaps one just as important question emerges when one considers what is clearly an different flight path in today’s tragic flight of the Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777.
Perhaps the best visualisation of what the issue is, comes from Vagelis Karmiros who has compared all the recent MH-17 flight paths as tracked by Flightaware and shows that while all of the ten most recent paths pass safely well south of the Donetsk region, and cross the airspace above the Sea of Azov, it was only the last flight that passed straight overhead Donetsk.
How and why did the diversion from the accepted diversion flight path and passage over the war zone occur? The above map shows precisely where the restricted airspace is, and how MH-17 flew straight over it on the 17/07/2014.
Also, had airlines and pilots been made aware of the recent and previous missile attacks on Ukraine air force aircraft in this area? While MH-17 may well have been mistaken for a military aircraft of the Ukraine air force, there was always a significant risk that this exact type of incident would occur.
Of course the most burning question still remains as to why this civilian aircraft was targeted, and who is responsible (directly and indirectly) for firing the missile. Those who supplied the missile system are just as guilty as those who pressed the button!
Twenty-seven Australians were aboard Malaysia Airlines Flight MH-17 apparently shot down by a missile fired by Russian-based and Russian-supplied rebels in Ukraine, which killed all 298 on board.
Kiev accused pro-Russian separatists battling Ukrainian forces of the “terrorist act’’ as stunned world leaders called for an international inquiry into the disaster, which could further fan the flames of the worst East-West crisis since the Cold War.
B777-2H6 (ER) 9M-MRD; C/N 28411; Photo: Wikipedia
Ukraine’s government and pro-Russian insurgents traded blame for the disaster, but comments attributed to a rebel chief suggesting his men may have downed Malaysia Airlines Flight MH-17 by mistake, believing it was a Ukrainian army transport plane.
And if this is true and the plane was brought down by Russian supported separatists using Russian know-how and Russian supplied heavy weapons and SAM missiles, then all roads lead back to Russia and stop clearly at the feet of the Russian president, Vladimir Putin. The finger of suspicion in this matter has to point to Russian operatives. Pro-Russian separatists would scarcely have the expertise to operative this type of technical equipment, therefore this indicates that they must have been operated by the Russian Army who have the prerequisite skills and experience. This theory is supported by reports (and video) of mobile SAM batteries crossing back into Russia the day after the attack.
The Russian president has again demonstrated that he has scant regard for human life inasmuch as he has failed to prevent the flow of money and weapons to these terrorists, in the obvious attempt to annexe more Ukraine territory to the Russian state. Putin should resign from the presidency, but of course he will not do so because he so enjoys the power of office. The elixir of power is more addictive than any narcotic! Furthermore, Russia has demonstrated that little has changed in its national outlook and foreign policy from its communist past, and is still not averse to being the “bully” to achieve its national needs and desires. Russia has demonstrated its continued dissatisfaction with the loss of territory since the breakup of the former USSR. Russian democracy resembles no other!
However, in Moscow, Russian President Vladimir Putin has blamed the Ukrainian government for the crash of a Malaysian Airlines jet that was shot down over eastern Ukraine, killing all 295 people on board. The government in Kiev is responsible for the fighting in eastern Ukraine between government troops and pro-Russian rebel forces which caused the downing of the civilian aircraft, Putin said at a cabinet meeting last night, according to a transcript released by the Kremlin.
Putin has repeatedly denied Russian involvement in the fighting in Ukraine. Mr Putin said Ukraine bore responsibility for the downing of a passenger plane, saying it would not have happened if Kiev had not resumed a military campaign against separatists. “I want to point out that this tragedy wouldn’t have happened if there was peace in this land, or at least if fighting hadn’t resumed in the southeast of Ukraine,” Putin said. “And undoubtedly, the state on whose territory this happened is responsible for this awful tragedy.”
The government in Kiev blamed the attack on pro-Russian rebels. The separatists denied the accusation. Ukraine’s state security service said it intercepted phone conversations among militants discussing the missile strike, which knocked Flight 17 from the sky near the eastern town of Torez, about 30 kilometres from the Russian border. The Boeing Co. 777 was en route to Kuala Lumpur from Amsterdam.
The Australian Prime Minister demanded Russia cooperate with any international investigation and took a swipe at Moscow, saying: “The bullying of small countries by big ones, the trampling of justice and decency in the pursuit of national aggrandisement, with reckless indifference to human life should have no place in our world.”
The Boeing 777-200ER, travelling from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur but carrying 27 Australian-born passengers, appeared to have broken up before impact and the burning wreckage was scattered over a wide area.
Malaysia said the plane had made no distress call.
Around the World
American intelligence authorities believe a surface-to-air missile took down the passenger jet. US officials said a US intelligence assessment suggests it is more likely pro-Russian separatists or the Russians rather than Ukrainian government forces shot down the aircraft. US Vice President Joe Biden said the incident was “not an accident’’ and described the Malaysia Airlines aircraft as having been “blown out of the sky.’’
Ukraine labelled the crash a “terrorist act” with the Ukraine embassy Charge D’Affaires to Australia, Mr Mykola Dzhydzhora, stating that the Ukraine understood “medium-range surface-to-air missile” was used in an attack on MH-17, which he said were supplied by the “Russian Federation”.
On the plane were 154 Dutch, 27 Auistralians, 23 Malaysians, 11 Indonesians, six from the UK, four each from Belgium and Germany and one from Canada. Other nationalities had yet to be confirmed.
All of the 15 crew were Malaysian nationals.
Dialog of terrorists discussing the shooting down of MH-17 from the Ukraine Security Service.
A Malaysian Airlines plane carrying 295 people, including 27 Australians, has been shot down in rebel-held eastern Ukraine, with reports saying the jet was shot down at 33,oo0ft.
The 1997 Boeing 777-2H6 (ER) C/N 28411 (9M-MRD) was flying from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur when it disappeared from radar and came down near Torez in the region of Donetsk. It remains unclear as to who fired the SAM.
The Malaysian Airlines flight appears to have been shot down by a surface-to-air missile called a BUK, a relic from the Soviet era, Britain’s Telegraph reports.
An Australian passport has apparently been found in the plane wreck of Malaysian Airline MH17 which was allegedly shot down while carrying 295 passengers.
Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko accused pro-Russian insurgents of shooting down the jet and described it as a “terrorist act”.
Poroshenko stated on the downed plane: “This incident is not a catastrophe. It is a terrorist act.”
All 280 passengers and 15 crew members on board the plane are believed to have died.
Horrifying images have emerged on social media showing dozens of severely mutilated corpses strewn in the plane wreckage.
Debris was spread out for kilometres and the tail of the passenger jet lay in a corn field with the Malaysian Airlines insignia on it. Rebel fighters and several fire trucks were seen nearby the crash site.
Poroshenko expressed his “deepest and sincerest sympathies for the families and loved ones of those killed” and vowed that “those behind this tragedy will be brought to justice.”
Vladimir Putin has been reported to say that he believed that he may have been the target of Ukraine forces, as he flew through the area at the same time as MH-17. The validity of this statement has not been confirmed, and may be an attempt by Russia to deflect blame over the incident.
The plane crashed in a region where pro-Russian rebels have been engaging Ukrainian army forces in recent weeks, even reportedly shooting down some Ukrainian air force planes.
But the rebel leaders have denied any involvement in the Malaysian Airlines crash and pledged to allow “international experts” access to the crash site.
Malaysian Airlines confirmed that it had “lost contact” with one its planes in Ukrainian airspace.
The rebels suspected of carrying out the attack on MH17 are now likely to become some of the world’s most wanted men.
The self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic is reported to have initially taken to Twitter to claim responsibility for downing an aircraft, but those tweets were later removed.
But the pro-Russian group which controls parts of eastern Ukraine is already said to have shot down four Ukrainian military aircraft in the last week alone.
No one has claimed responsibility for the attack, with both the government in Kiev and pro-Russia separatists officially denying any involvement.
But that will not stop the international finger of blame pointing towards the rebel forces operating in the region.
Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko has already described the disaster as a deliberate act.
“I would like to bring your attention to the fact that we are not calling it an accident, or a disaster, but an act of terrorism,” said Mr Poroshenko.
While demands by the Malaysian Prime Minister Mr Najib Razak that “perpetrators must swiftly be brought to justice” will increase pressure for an international response.
Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott has also called for justice: “If a surface to air missile is involved, it is not an accident – it’s a crime and the perpetrators must be brought swiftly to justice.”
It is the belief of this writer that if the aircradft was shot down by pro-Russian separatists using Russian supplied SAM missiles, then Russia (and thus Putin) is implicated in this terrorist action and must ultimately accept responsibility and the repercussions associated with the incident.
George Brown is a decorated soldier and health professional and 40 year veteran in the field of emergency nursing and paramedical practice, both military and civilian areas. He has senior management positions in the delivery of paramedical services. Opinions expressed in these columns are solely those of the author and should not be construed as being those of any organization to which he may be connected.
He was born in the UK of Scottish ancestry from Aberdeen and a member of the Clan MacDougall. He is a member of the Macedonian community in Newcastle, and speaks fluent Macedonian. While this may seem a contradiction, it is his wife who is Macedonian, and as a result he embraced the Macedonian language and the Orthodox faith.
His interests include aviation and digital photography, and he always enjoys the opportunity to combine the two. Navigate to his Flickr site to see recent additions to his photo library.
Џорџ Браун е украсени војник и професионално здравствено лице и 40 годишен ветеран во областа на за итни случаи старечки и парамедицински пракса, двете воени и цивилни области. Тој има високи менаџерски позиции во испораката на парамедицински услуги. Мислењата изразени во овие колумни се исклучиво на авторот и не треба да се толкува како оние на било која организација тој може да биде поврзан.
Тој е роден во Велика Британија на шкотскиот потекло од Абердин и член на Kланот MacDougall. Тој е член на македонската заедница во Њукасл, и зборува течно македонски. Иако ова можеби изгледа контрадикција, тоа е неговата сопруга кој е македонски, и како резултат научил македонскиот јазик и ја примија православната вера.
Неговите интереси вклучуваат авијација и дигитална фотографија, и тој секогаш ужива во можност да се комбинираат двете. Отиди до неговиот Фликр сајт да видите последните дополнувања на неговата слика библиотека.
Discussion on the law that applies to or affects Australia's emergency services and emergency management, by Michael Eburn, PhD, Australian Lawyer. Email: meburn@australianemergencylaw.com
Oh, let's see...distinguished Gen-X'er, frustrated writer and mom living in the confines of a small town that thinks it's a big deal. And have I mentioned Walmart yet?